It is their party and their choice. Is it so simple? A man with less than 100 days experience may cling to the top chair in AP, and his only credential is being the sole son of the mass leader who was 'killed'. Otherwise a very controversial figure accused of many clandestine deals and possessing wealth much much beyond 'known' sources of income and also a power dealer, a defacto cm, media man, links with satyam etc etc.
Give a bottle of tears and you can rule this land- that is bharath.
YSR was dynamic and a great mass leader, no doubt. But surely there are a lots of skeletons in the cupboard- be it satyam, tirumala or elections or evm's or evangelism etc etc so who else but his son can safely' guard or destroy them before it comes to notice. no wonder the desperation is there.
It looks like slowly India is going to kingdoms.....
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

IT IS SURPRISING THAT THE PEOPLE DONOT REVOLT TO SUCH DYNASTIC RULE.MAY BE THAT DURING FREEDOM STRUGGLE THE PEOPLEWANTED ONLY THE BRITISH TO GO BUT WERENOT ALIEN TO THE KINGS AND THE QUEENS RULING THEM .DEMOCRACY TO INDIANS IS SOME SORT OF A PUZZLE
ReplyDelete